Methodological and methodical principles of proactive life cycle management of complex technical objects
https://doi.org/10.17586/0021-3454-2022-65-11-781-788
Abstract
Basic methodological and methodical principles used in the creation of the domestic information and analytical platform and corresponding information systems are considered. This methodology is based on application of two novel theories: the theory of proactive (anticipatory) life cycle management of complex technical objects, as well as its complementary theory of multi-criteria evaluation and selection of the most preferred models and polymodel complexes describing the functioning of complex technical objects and corresponding information and analytical systems. The latter theory is called by the authors the qualimetry of models and polymodel complexes. These two theories make a significant contribution to the development of modern computer science: thanks to the theory of proactive life cycle management of complex technical objects, modern computer science is enriched at a constructive level with methods and methdological support developed in the frames of classical cybernetics (generalized control theory); thanks to the developed qualimetry of models and polymodel complexes, a new mathematical apparatus has appeared in computer science, which makes it possible to increase the validity and quality of design solutions in creation of software and mathematical support for information systems, reduce the cost of their design and operation. Brief information about the practical implementation of the developed theories is presented.
Keywords
information and analytical platform,
information and analytical system,
proactive control,
qualimetry of models and polymodel complexes,
cyber-physical systems,
system life cycle,
complex technical objects
Supporting agencies: the study was supported by a grant from the Russian Science Foundation N 22-19-00767.
About the Authors
М. Yu. Okhtilev
St. Petersburg Federal Research Center of the RAS
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Mikhail Yu. Okhtilev — Dr. Sci., Professor; St. Petersburg Institute for Informatics and Automation of the RAS, Laboratory of Information Technologies in System Analysis and Modeling; Chief Researcher
St. Petersburg
P. А. Okhtilev
St. Petersburg Federal Research Center of the RAS
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Pavel A. Okhtilev — PhD; St. Petersburg Institute for Informatics and Automation of the RAS, Laboratory of Information Technologies in System Analysis and Modeling; Junior Researcher
St. Petersburg
B. V. Sokolov
St. Petersburg Federal Research Center of the RAS
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Boris V. Sokolov — Dr. Sci., Professor; St.Petersburg Institute for Informatics and Automation of the RAS, Laboratory of Information Technologies in System Analysis and Modeling; Chief Researcher
St. Petersburg
R. M. Yusupov
St. Petersburg Federal Research Center of the RAS
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Rafael М. Yusupov — Dr. Sci., Corresponding Member of the RAS; St. Petersburg Institute for Informatics and Automation of the RAS, Laboratory of Information Technologies in System Analysis and Modeling; Head of a Scientific Direction of SPIIRAN
St. Petersburg
References
1. Strategiya tsifrovoy transformatsii raketno-kosmicheskoy otrasli RF na period do 2025 goda i perspektivu do 2030 goda (Strategy for Digital Transformation of the Rocket and Space Industry of the Russian Federation for the Period up to 2025 and the Prospect until 2030), Moscow, 2019, 33 р. (in Russ.)
2. Belov V.S. Informatsionno-analiticheskiye sistemy. Osnovy proyektirovaniya i primeneniya: uchebnoye posobiye, rukovodstvo, praktikum (Information-Analytical Systems. Design and Application Fundamentals: Tutorial, Guide, Workshop), Moscow, 2005, 111 р. (in Russ.)
3. Burmatov S.V. Scientific Bulletin of MSTU GA, 2012, no. 178, pp. 65–70. (in Russ.)
4. Okhtilev M.Yu., Mustafin N.G., Miller V.E., Sokolov B.V. Journal of Instrument Engineering, 2014, no. 11(57), pp. 7–15. (in Russ.)
5. Perminov A.N., Prokhorovich V.E., Ptushkin A.I. V Mire Nerazrushayushchego Kontrolya (V mire NK), 2004, no. 4(26), pp. 8–11. (in Russ.)
6. PROMISE consortium, Product Lifecycle Management and Information Tracking Using Smart Embedded Systems, http://www.promise.no/.
7. Takata S., Kimura F., van Houten F.J.A.M., Westkamper E., Shpitalni M., Ceglarek D., Lee J. CIRP Annals, 2004, no. 2(53), pp. 643–655.
8. Horvath I., Gerritsen B.H.M. Proceedings of TMCE, 2012, рр. 19–36.
9. Okhtilev M.Yu., Sokolov B.V., Yusupov R.M. Intellektual'nyye tekhnologii monitoringa sostoyaniya i upravleniya strukturnoy dinamikoy slozhnykh tekhnicheskikh ob"yektov (Intelligent Technologies for Monitoring the State and Managing the Structural Dynamics of Complex Technical Objects), Moscow, 2006, 410 р. (in Russ.)
10. Akhmetov R.N., Vasiliev I.E., Kapitonov V.A., Okhtilev M.Yu., Sokolov B.V. Aerospace Instrument-Making, 2015, no. 4, pp. 3–54. (in Russ.)
11. https://petrocometa.ru/. (in Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Okhtilev М.Yu., Okhtilev P.А., Sokolov B.V., Yusupov R.M. Methodological and methodical principles of proactive life cycle management of complex technical objects. Journal of Instrument Engineering. 2022;65(11):781-788. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17586/0021-3454-2022-65-11-781-788
Views:
27
Email this article 